See how Promptster actually works.
Two minutes of process telemetry: the prompts, tool calls, file diffs, and decision points captured from a real candidate session. The same evidence your reviewers will use.
Same assessment. Same 12/12 green. Different engineer.
Alex and Sam worked the identical date-parser task and both submitted with every visible test passing. An ATS scores them the same. The session telemetry doesn't.
- Visible tests
- 12/12 ✓
- AI spend
- $19.80
- Avoidable spend
- $0 — lean session
- Hidden verify suite
- ✓ passed
- How
- Read the contract first, caught the regression in plan mode, root-cause fix.
- Visible tests
- 12/12 ✓
- AI spend
- $34.20 — 1.7× Alex
- Avoidable spend
- $13.34 (39%) — grind + re-pasted files
- Hidden verify suite
- ✗ failed
- How
- Zero reads, pasted the first proposal, hardcoded a 2026-only timezone table that satisfies exactly the tests it saw.
Now multiply the difference by every task, every engineer, every sprint. The way someone works with AI is a recurring line item — in API spend today, in the regressions that ship next quarter. The replay shows you which one you're hiring before you hire them.
Read the process,
not just the commit.
Twelve founding teams will ship this with us. If you hire 5+ engineers a year and your current technical screen can't tell paste from craft, we should talk.